Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 2/8] sched: Maintain aggregated tasks count incfs_rq at each hierarchy level

From: Bharata B Rao
Date: Tue Oct 13 2009 - 23:44:32 EST


On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:27:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:21 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> > index 652e8bd..eeeddb8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> > @@ -243,6 +243,27 @@ find_matching_se(struct sched_entity **se, struct sched_entity **pse)
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
> >
> > +static void add_cfs_rq_tasks_running(struct sched_entity *se,
> > + unsigned long count)
> > +{
> > + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> > +
> > + for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> > + cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > + cfs_rq->nr_tasks_running += count;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void sub_cfs_rq_tasks_running(struct sched_entity *se,
> > + unsigned long count)
> > +{
> > + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> > +
> > + for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> > + cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > + cfs_rq->nr_tasks_running -= count;
> > + }
> > +}
> >
> > /**************************************************************
> > * Scheduling class tree data structure manipulation methods:
> > @@ -969,6 +990,7 @@ static void enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup)
> > wakeup = 1;
> > }
> >
> > + add_cfs_rq_tasks_running(&p->se, 1);
> > hrtick_update(rq);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -991,6 +1013,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> > sleep = 1;
> > }
> >
> > + sub_cfs_rq_tasks_running(&p->se, 1);
> > hrtick_update(rq);
> > }
>
> This seems daft, why not add the incement to the for_each_sched_entity()
> loop already present in both functions?

Right. There was a reason why it started out like this and I can't seem to
remember. Now looking at the current code, I don't see why I can't do what
you suggest. Will try this for the next post.

Regards,
Bharata.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/