Re: [PATCH] this_cpu: Use this_cpu_xx in trace_functions_graph.c

[Tejun Heo]

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>> Oh... one question tho.  I used __this_cpu_*() as other conversions
>> but I think we should be using the version without the underscores.
>> The relationship between get_cpu_var() and __get_cpu_var() is
>> different from the one between this_cpu_*() and __this_cpu_*().
> 
> For operations like inc/add/dec/sub you need to use the version with __
> otherwise the arches that do not support these operations will have to
> generate useless expensive code that disables / reenables preempt.
> 
> For this_cpu_ptr / __this_cpu_ptr it does not matter. this_cpu_ptr gives
> you additional checks.

Yes, you're right.  The naming scheme in percpu sucks really hard.
The subtle differences among [__]get_cpu_var(), [__]this_cpu_ptr() and
other this_cpu ops.  Arghhhhhh.......

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/