Re: [LTP] [PATCH] pac_common: redesign function for findingStart Of Frame

[Subrata Modak]

On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 22:56 +0200, NÃmeth MÃrton wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> I wrote a simple test for pac_find_sof(). I implemented a user-space test
> which takes the implementation from the source file and calls it directly.
> You can find the source code of the test attached.

NÃmeth,

Can you please add this test to LTP then ?

Regards--
Subrata

> 
> The test results for the pac_find_sof() implementation in the Linux kernel
> 2.6.32-rc1 is the following:
> 
> Test case 1: exact match
> PDEBUG: SOF found, bytes to analyze: 5. Frame starts at byte #5
> PASSED
> 
> Test case 2: offset 1
> PDEBUG: SOF found, bytes to analyze: 6. Frame starts at byte #6
> PASSED
> 
> Test case 3: offset 1, first byte may be misleading
> FAILED
> 
> Test case 4: offset 2, first two bytes may be misleading
> PDEBUG: SOF found, bytes to analyze: 7. Frame starts at byte #7
> PASSED
> 
> Test case 5: offset 3, first three bytes may be misleading
> FAILED
> 
> Test case 6: offset 4, first four bytes may be misleading
> FAILED
> 
> Test case 7: pattern starts at end of packet and continues in the next one
> PDEBUG: SOF found, bytes to analyze: 1. Frame starts at byte #1
> PASSED
> 
> Test case 8: splited pattern, with misleading first byte
> FAILED
> 
> Test case 9: splited pattern, with misleading first three bytes
> FAILED
> 
> Test case 10: no match, extra byte at offset 1
> PASSED
> 
> Test case 11: no match, extra byte at offset 2
> PASSED
> 
> Test case 12: no match, extra byte at offset 3
> PASSED
> 
> Test case 13: no match, extra byte at offset 4
> PASSED
> 
> I also executed the test with the patched pac_find_sof() implementation
> and that one passes all these test cases.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	MÃrton NÃmeth
> 
> NÃmeth MÃrton wrote:
> > From: MÃrton NÃmeth <nm127@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The original implementation of pac_find_sof() does not always find
> > the Start Of Frame (SOF) marker. Replace it with a state machine
> > based design.
> > 
> > The change was tested with Labtec Webcam 2200.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: MÃrton NÃmeth <nm127@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > --- linux-2.6.32-rc1.orig/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac_common.h	2009-09-10 00:13:59.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.32-rc1/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac_common.h	2009-10-04 21:49:19.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -33,6 +33,45 @@
> >  static const unsigned char pac_sof_marker[5] =
> >  		{ 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0x96 };
> > 
> > +/*
> > +   The following state machine finds the SOF marker sequence
> > +   0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0x96 in a byte stream.
> > +
> > +	   +----------+
> > +	   | 0: START |<---------------\
> > +	   +----------+<-\             |
> > +	     |       \---/otherwise    |
> > +	     v 0xff                    |
> > +	   +----------+ otherwise      |
> > +	   |     1    |--------------->*
> > +	   |          |                ^
> > +	   +----------+                |
> > +	     |                         |
> > +	     v 0xff                    |
> > +	   +----------+<-\0xff         |
> > +	/->|          |--/             |
> > +	|  |     2    |--------------->*
> > +	|  |          | otherwise      ^
> > +	|  +----------+                |
> > +	|    |                         |
> > +	|    v 0x00                    |
> > +	|  +----------+                |
> > +	|  |     3    |                |
> > +	|  |          |--------------->*
> > +	|  +----------+ otherwise      ^
> > +	|    |                         |
> > +   0xff |    v 0xff                    |
> > +	|  +----------+                |
> > +	\--|     4    |                |
> > +	   |          |----------------/
> > +	   +----------+ otherwise
> > +	     |
> > +	     v 0x96
> > +	   +----------+
> > +	   |  FOUND   |
> > +	   +----------+
> > +*/
> > +
> >  static unsigned char *pac_find_sof(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev,
> >  					unsigned char *m, int len)
> >  {
> > @@ -41,17 +80,54 @@ static unsigned char *pac_find_sof(struc
> > 
> >  	/* Search for the SOF marker (fixed part) in the header */
> >  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> > -		if (m[i] == pac_sof_marker[sd->sof_read]) {
> > -			sd->sof_read++;
> > -			if (sd->sof_read == sizeof(pac_sof_marker)) {
> > +		switch (sd->sof_read) {
> > +		case 0:
> > +			if (m[i] == 0xff)
> > +				sd->sof_read = 1;
> > +			break;
> > +		case 1:
> > +			if (m[i] == 0xff)
> > +				sd->sof_read = 2;
> > +			else
> > +				sd->sof_read = 0;
> > +			break;
> > +		case 2:
> > +			switch (m[i]) {
> > +			case 0x00:
> > +				sd->sof_read = 3;
> > +				break;
> > +			case 0xff:
> > +				/* stay in this state */
> > +				break;
> > +			default:
> > +				sd->sof_read = 0;
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> > +		case 3:
> > +			if (m[i] == 0xff)
> > +				sd->sof_read = 4;
> > +			else
> > +				sd->sof_read = 0;
> > +			break;
> > +		case 4:
> > +			switch (m[i]) {
> > +			case 0x96:
> > +				/* Pattern found */
> >  				PDEBUG(D_FRAM,
> >  					"SOF found, bytes to analyze: %u."
> >  					" Frame starts at byte #%u",
> >  					len, i + 1);
> >  				sd->sof_read = 0;
> >  				return m + i + 1;
> > +				break;
> > +			case 0xff:
> > +				sd->sof_read = 2;
> > +				break;
> > +			default:
> > +				sd->sof_read = 0;
> >  			}
> > -		} else {
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> >  			sd->sof_read = 0;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/