Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits - v2

[Pavel Emelyanov]

> as I already stated, it seems perfectly fine for me 

You're not the only one interested in it, sorry. Besides, I
got your point in "I'm find with it". Now get mine which is
about "I am not".

> can be trivially mapped to the two values, by chosing a
> fixed multiplicative base (let's say '1s' to simplify :) 
> 
>   with 50%, you get 1s/0.5s
>   with 20%, you get 1s/0.2s
>   with  5%, you get 1s/0.05s
> 
> well, you get the idea :)

No I don't.
Is 1s/0.5s worse or better than 2s/1s?
How should I make a choice?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/