Re: [Patchs vs. percpu-next] Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters

[Rusty Russell]

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:27:53 am Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > Does this mean we can kill local.h soon?
> 
> Can we remove local.h from modules?

This looks sweet to me!

Only comment: not sure struct module_ref is required once we have __percpu
markers.

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/