[patch 27/37] net: restore tx timestamping for accelerated vlans

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Oct 09 2009 - 19:43:01 EST


2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 81bbb3d4048cf577b5babcb0834230de391a35c5 ]

Since commit 9b22ea560957de1484e6b3e8538f7eef202e3596
( net: fix packet socket delivery in rx irq handler )

We lost rx timestamping of packets received on accelerated vlans.

Effect is that tcpdump on real dev can show strange timings, since it gets rx timestamps
too late (ie at skb dequeueing time, not at skb queueing time)

14:47:26.986871 IP 192.168.20.110 > 192.168.20.141: icmp 64: echo request seq 1
14:47:26.986786 IP 192.168.20.141 > 192.168.20.110: icmp 64: echo reply seq 1

14:47:27.986888 IP 192.168.20.110 > 192.168.20.141: icmp 64: echo request seq 2
14:47:27.986781 IP 192.168.20.141 > 192.168.20.110: icmp 64: echo reply seq 2

14:47:28.986896 IP 192.168.20.110 > 192.168.20.141: icmp 64: echo request seq 3
14:47:28.986780 IP 192.168.20.141 > 192.168.20.110: icmp 64: echo reply seq 3

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
net/core/dev.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2248,6 +2248,9 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *sk
int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
__be16 type;

+ if (!skb->tstamp.tv64)
+ net_timestamp(skb);
+
if (skb->vlan_tci && vlan_hwaccel_do_receive(skb))
return NET_RX_SUCCESS;

@@ -2255,9 +2258,6 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *sk
if (netpoll_receive_skb(skb))
return NET_RX_DROP;

- if (!skb->tstamp.tv64)
- net_timestamp(skb);
-
if (!skb->iif)
skb->iif = skb->dev->ifindex;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/