Re: [RFC][PATCH] kmap_atomic_push

[jim owens]

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The double unmap gives a preemption point, which sounds like a good
> thing to have, because your scheme could run for a long while without
> enabling preemption, which is badness.

Thanks, optimizing my loop, I forgot all about
the old long code path not preempting problem.

Now I have to love the patch for making it harder to be stupid :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/