Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

[Roland Dreier]

 > Performance events filtering is being worked on and now with the proper 
 > non-DoS limit you've added you can lose events too, dont you? So it's 
 > all a question of how much buffering to add - and with perf events too 
 > you can buffer arbitrary large amount of events.

No, the idea for non-DoS for ummunotify is that we would limit the
number of regions the application can register; so an application might
hit the limit up front but no runtime loss of events once a region was
registered successfully.

 > I think this could be done in a simpler, less limited, more generic, 
 > more useful form by using some variation of perf events.
 > 
 > You should be able to get all that you want by adding two TRACE_EVENT() 
 > tracepoints and using the existing perf event syscall to get the events 
 > to user-space.

Yes, I would like to use perf events too.  Would it be plausible to
create a way for userspace to create a "counter" for each address range
being watched?  Then events would not be lost, because those counters
would become non-zero.

 > Meaning that this:
 >   9 files changed, 1060 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Note that lots/ of the files touched here are in Documentation or are
one-line changes to Makefiles etc.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/