Re: [PATCH] WARN_ONCE(): use bool for condition

[Cesar Eduardo Barros]

Daniel Walker escreveu:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 15:25 -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> > -               int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);                      \
> > +               bool __ret_warn_on = (condition);                       \
>
> Did you try it without removing the "!!" ? In my original email I tested
> the path of least resistance, and I left the "!!" in there..

Just tried, same result (it seems gcc can easily see past the double 
negation).

--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx
cesar.barros@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/