Re: mmotm 2009-09-09-22-56 uploaded
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Fri Sep 18 2009 - 11:26:51 EST
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > This seems to be related to 2547089 "x86/PCI: initialize PCI bus
> > node numbers early" since cpumask_of_pcibus() on x86 doesn't check
> > for -1 pcibus_to_node() like most other architectures. It'll
> > simply index into cpumask_of_node for whatever the pci_sysdata's
> > node is, and in this case that's -1.
> >
>
> Suresh, could you give this patch a try? It turns out that the
> mp_bus_to_node map simply leaves all busses that don't have memory
> affinity to -1, so cpu_online_mask is actually the appropriate
> cpumask to return and x86 doesn't catch this.
>
>
> x86: default pcibus cpumask to all cpus if it lacks affinity
>
> The early initialization of the pci bus to node mapping leaves all
> busses with a node id of -1 if it lacks memory affinity. Thus,
> cpumask_of_pcibus must return all online cpus for such busses.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -143,7 +143,11 @@ static inline int __pcibus_to_node(const struct
> pci_bus *bus) static inline const struct cpumask *
> cpumask_of_pcibus(const struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> - return cpumask_of_node(__pcibus_to_node(bus));
> + int node;
> +
> + node = __pcibus_to_node(bus);
> + return (node == -1) ? cpu_online_mask :
> + cpumask_of_node(node);
> }
> #endif
Yeah, this look reasonable. Thanks David. Assuming it works for
Suresh, I'll queue it up.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/