Re: [PATCH] hwpoison: fix uninitialized warning

From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Tue Sep 15 2009 - 20:52:02 EST


On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:19:07AM +0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Fix mmotm build warning, presumably also in linux-next:
> > mm/memory.c: In function `do_swap_page':
> > mm/memory.c:2498: warning: `pte' may be used uninitialized in this function
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > I've only noticed this warning on one machine, the powerpc: certainly it
> > needs CONFIG_MIGRATION or CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE to see it, but I thought
> > I had one of those set on other machines - just musing in case it's being
> > masked elsewhere by some other bug...

> The lines was introduced in this patch:
>
> entry = pte_to_swp_entry(orig_pte);
> - if (is_migration_entry(entry)) {
> - migration_entry_wait(mm, pmd, address);
> + if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
> + if (is_migration_entry(entry)) {
> + migration_entry_wait(mm, pmd, address);
> + } else if (is_hwpoison_entry(entry)) {
> + ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
> + } else {
> + print_bad_pte(vma, address, pte, NULL);
> + ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
> + }
> goto out;
> }
>
> Given that currently there are only two types of non swap entries:
> migration/hwpoison, the last 'else' block is in fact dead code..

Ah, yes, I think it is dead code on x86 (32 and 64), where the
swp_entry_t is well packed. But not dead code on ppc64, which has

#define __swp_type(entry) (((entry).val >> 1) & 0x3f)

which is allowing swap types up to 63, when in fact the highest
we use is 31: that leaves space for 32 more non_swap_entry types.

So the compiler was absolutely right to complain about the
uninitialized variable on ppc64, but not on x86. It's a little
surprising that ppc64 allows 64 swap types, but nothing wrong.

Thanks,
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/