Re: 2.6.31rc5 RAID10 lockdep report - sysfs_nofity_dirent lockingissue

From: Dan Williams
Date: Tue Sep 15 2009 - 19:06:03 EST


>From 1ee8b5bfeb2de765d3b2acbaf5357c4c0eb65dbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:42:08 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Allow sysfs_notify_dirent to be called from interrupt context.

sysfs_notify_dirent is a simple atomic operation that can be used to
alert user-space that new data can be read from a sysfs attribute.

Unfortunately it cannot currently be called from non-process context
because of its use of spin_lock which is sometimes taken with
interrupts enabled.

So change all lockers of sysfs_open_dirent_lock to disable interrupts,
thus making sysfs_notify_dirent safe to be called from non-process
context (as drivers/md does in md_safemode_timeout).

sysfs_get_open_dirent is (documented as being) only called from
process context, so it uses spin_lock_irq. Other places
use spin_lock_irqsave.

The usage for sysfs_notify_dirent in md_safemode_timeout was
introduced in 2.6.28, so this patch is suitable for that and more
recent kernels.

Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Joel Andres Granados <jgranado@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
---
> > Greg?
> >
> > Looks like this never made it upstream, and now Hans is hitting this
> > in his tests.
>
> Ok, I don't have this in my queue, so someone needs to resubmit it and
> tell me what kernel trees it should be applicable for.

As mentioned in the commit log should be applicable back to 2.6.28.

Thanks,
Dan


fs/sysfs/file.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
index 561a9c0..f5ea468 100644
--- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int sysfs_get_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
struct sysfs_open_dirent *od, *new_od = NULL;

retry:
- spin_lock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);

if (!sd->s_attr.open && new_od) {
sd->s_attr.open = new_od;
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int sysfs_get_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
list_add_tail(&buffer->list, &od->buffers);
}

- spin_unlock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);

if (od) {
kfree(new_od);
@@ -315,8 +315,9 @@ static void sysfs_put_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
struct sysfs_buffer *buffer)
{
struct sysfs_open_dirent *od = sd->s_attr.open;
+ unsigned long flags;

- spin_lock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);

list_del(&buffer->list);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&od->refcnt))
@@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ static void sysfs_put_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
else
od = NULL;

- spin_unlock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);

kfree(od);
}
@@ -456,8 +457,9 @@ static unsigned int sysfs_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
void sysfs_notify_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
{
struct sysfs_open_dirent *od;
+ unsigned long flags;

- spin_lock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);

od = sd->s_attr.open;
if (od) {
@@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ void sysfs_notify_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
wake_up_interruptible(&od->poll);
}

- spin_unlock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysfs_notify_dirent);

--
1.6.0.6



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/