Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtual block device driver (ramzswap)

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tuesday 15 September 2009 03:30:23 you wrote:
>> > So, its extremely difficult to wait for the proper fix.
>>
>> Then make ramzswap depend on !CONFIG_ARM. In any case, CONFIG_ARM bits
>> really don't belong into drivers/block.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Ed Tomlinson <edt@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Problem is that ramzswap is usefull on boxes like the n800/n810...  So this is a bad
> suggestion from my POV.    How about a comment saying this code goes when the
> fix arrives???

Just put the driver in driver/staging until the issue is resolved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/