Re: [PATCH] [1/5] kbuild: Fix ld-option Makefile macro to reallywork

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Mon Sep 14 2009 - 17:47:19 EST


On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:18:06PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Needed for the next patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> scripts/Kbuild.include | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc1-ak/scripts/Kbuild.include
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc1-ak.orig/scripts/Kbuild.include
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc1-ak/scripts/Kbuild.include
> @@ -83,11 +83,12 @@ TMPOUT := $(if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD),$(firstw
> # is automatically cleaned up.
> try-run = $(shell set -e; \
> TMP="$(TMPOUT).$$$$.tmp"; \
> + TMPO="$(TMPOUT).$$$$.o"; \
> if ($(1)) >/dev/null 2>&1; \
> then echo "$(2)"; \
> else echo "$(3)"; \
> fi; \
> - rm -f "$$TMP")
> + rm -f "$$TMP" "$$TMPO")
>
> # as-option
> # Usage: cflags-y += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-isa=foo,)
> @@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ cc-ifversion = $(shell [ $(call cc-versi
> # ld-option
> # Usage: ldflags += $(call ld-option, -Wl$(comma)--hash-style=both)
> ld-option = $(call try-run,\
> - $(CC) $(1) -nostdlib -xc /dev/null -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2))
> + $(CC) /dev/null -c -o "$$TMPO" ; $(LD) $(1) "$$TMPO" -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2))
>
> ######

So now we pass the option direct to the linker rather than via gcc -wl.
I assume this breaks the other 8 uses of ld-option in the kernel?

Or does ld understand the -wl,... syntax?

Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/