Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes 0/7] tracing/kprobes: kprobe-based event tracer update and perf support

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]  I'm really looking forward seeing this C expression-like
> kprobe creation tool.  It seems powerful enough to replace printk +
> kernel rebuild.  No need anymore to write some printk to debug,
> worrying, [...]

To a large extent, systemtap had delivered this already some years
ago, including the cushy ponies dancing in the sunlight.  While such
low-level machinery is fine, some of our experience indicates that it
is dramatically easier to use if high-level, symbolic, debugging data
is used to compute probe locations and variable names/types/locations.

It is also too easy to stress the low-level machinery beyond its
humble origins, in this case meaning putting probes in all kinds of
tender spots that go "ouch".  The kprobes robustness patches coming in
are great and will benefit all of our efforts, but it will be awhile
until the kernel can survive a fuzz/crashme type stress test on that
subsystem.  So expect ongoing effort there.

- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/