Re: [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA - V4.

[Alok Kataria]

Hi Christoph, 

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 16:08 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:12:26PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Alok Kataria wrote:
> >> I see your point, but the ring logic or the ABI that we use to
> >> communicate between the hypervisor and guest is not shared between our
> >> storage and network drivers. As a result, I don't see any benefit of
> >> separating out this ring handling mechanism, on the contrary it might
> >> just add some overhead of translating between various layers for our
> >> SCSI driver.
> >>   
> >
> > But if you separate out the ring logic, it allows the scsi logic to be  
> > shared by other paravirtual device drivers.  This is significant and  
> > important from a Linux point of view.
> 
> As someone who has been hacking on a virtio scsi prototype I don't think
> it's a good idea.

Can I take a look at your work on virtio scsi ?

>   The vmware driver is a horrible design and I don't
> think it should be merged. 

Can you be more specific ? What problems do you see in the driver or the
ABI.

>  Besides beeing a ugly driver and ABI we
> really should not support this kind of closed protocol development.
> 

Alok

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/