Re: [RFC][v6][PATCH 8/9]: Define clone_with_pids() syscall

From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Date: Thu Sep 10 2009 - 17:24:04 EST


Arnd Bergmann [arnd@xxxxxxxx] wrote:
|
| I wonder if we can avoid spreading copies of this function across
| all architectures.
|
| Would it be possible to define it like this?

Since this is a variant of clone() and clone is listed as a PTREGSCALL(),
I pass in the pt_regs.

arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S lists clone() under this comment:

/*
* System calls that need a pt_regs pointer.
*/

Is there a guideline on what system calls use/need pt_regs ?

Thanks,

Suakdev

|
| asmlinkage long
| clone_with_pids(int flags, unsigned long child_stack_base, int __user *parent_tid_ptr,
| int __user *child_tid_ptr, struct pid_set __user *pid_setp)
| {
| if (!child_stack_base) {
| struct pt_regs *regs;
|
| regs = task_pt_regs(current);
| child_stack_base = user_stack_pointer(regs);
| }
|
| return do_fork_with_pids(clone_flags, child_stack_base, 0,
| parent_tid_ptr, child_tid_ptr, pid_setp);
| }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/