Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 10 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > > However, the interactivity problems still remain.  Does that 
> > > > mean it's not a latency issue?
> > > 
> > > It means that Jens's test-app, which demonstrated and helped us 
> > > fix the issue for him does not help us fix it for you just yet.
> > 
> > Lemme qualify that by saying that Jens's issues are improved not 
> > fixed [he has not re-run with latest latt.c yet] but not all things 
> > are fully fixed yet. For example the xmodmap thing sounds 
> > interesting - could that be a child-runs-first effect?
> 
> I thought so too, so when -tip failed to boot I pulled the patches 
> from Mike into 2.6.31. It doesn't change anything for xmodmap, 
> though.

Note, you can access just the pristine scheduler patches by checking 
out and testing tip:sched/core - no need to pull them out and apply.

Your crash looks like clocksource related - that's in a separate 
topic which you can thus isolate if you use sched/core.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/