Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix code patching for paravirt-alternatives on 486

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Tue Sep 08 2009 - 20:47:40 EST


On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 17:31 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
[...]
> I'm wondering if it wouldn't be cleaner to fold the jump into
> sync_core() and moving the sync_core() up before local_irq_restore().

Exactly as I suggested below the dashes. :-)

The only reason I didn't do that initially was that I don't know whether
or not there's a good reason for the current placement of sync_core()
after local_irq_restore().

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Who are all these weirdos? - David Bowie, about L-Space IRC channel #afp

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part