Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kmemleak: few small cleanups and clear commandsupport

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:29:30AM -0700, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 17:44 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Here is my third respin, this time rebased ontop of:
> >
> > git://linux-arm.org/linux-2.6 kmemleak
> >
> > As suggested by Catalin we now clear the list by only painting reported
> > unreferenced objects and the color we use is grey to ensure future
> > scans are possible on these same objects to account for new allocations
> > in the future referenced on the cleared objects.
> >
> > Patch 3 is now a little different, now with a paint_ptr() and
> > a __paint_it() helper.
> 
> Thanks for the patches. They look ok now, I'll merge them tomorrow to my
> kmemleak branch and give them a try.
> 
> > I tested this by clearing kmemleak after bootup, then writing my
> > own buggy module which kmalloc()'d onto some internal pointer,
> > scanned, unloaded, and scanned again and then saw a new shiny
> > report come up:
> 
> BTW, kmemleak comes with a test module which does this.

Thanks for the note, I'll use this in case I need to test more stuff.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/