Re: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks andmeasurements

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Sep 07 2009 - 10:41:58 EST

On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:41:51 +0300
> >It shows similar curves and behavior to the 8-core results i posted
> >- BFS is slower than mainline in virtually every measurement. The
> >ratios are different for different parts of the graphs - but the
> >trend is similar.
> Dude, not cool.
> 1. Quad HT is not the same as a 4-core desktop, you're doing it with
> 8 cores

4 cores, 8 threads. Which is basically the standard desktop cpu going
forward... (4 cores already is today, 8 threads is that any day now)

Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at