Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] load-balancing and cpu_power -v2

From: Gautham R Shenoy
Date: Wed Sep 02 2009 - 06:58:09 EST

On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:34:31AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A more complete version, one that compiles and mostly works on the
> simple tests to which it was subjected.

Very nice series.

Will queue it up for testing to see if anything
obvious breaks.

> It still lacks integration with APERF/MPERF because that stuff was
> hidding in some acpi driver instead of placed in arch code for general
> consumption.. will fix.
> Also, SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER seems redundant in the face of sd->level ==
> SD_LV_SIBLING, should we remove the SD_flag or depricate the level?

IIRC, the only place where we used SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER was while assigning
the cpu_power. With the arch_smt_gain() coming into picture, I feel we
can remove the SD_flag.

Not sure what you meant by deprecating the level.
> Anyway, have at it, poke holes and report issues.

Thanks and Regards
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at