Re: page allocator regression on nommu

[Paul Mundt]

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:30:56AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:48:43PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Hi Mel,
> > 
> > It seems we've managed to trigger a fairly interesting conflict between
> > the anti-fragmentation disabling code and the nommu region rbtree. I've
> > bisected it down to:
> > 
> > commit 49255c619fbd482d704289b5eb2795f8e3b7ff2e
> > Author: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Tue Jun 16 15:31:58 2009 -0700
> > 
> >     page allocator: move check for disabled anti-fragmentation out of fastpath
> > 
> >     On low-memory systems, anti-fragmentation gets disabled as there is
> >     nothing it can do and it would just incur overhead shuffling pages between
> >     lists constantly.  Currently the check is made in the free page fast path
> >     for every page.  This patch moves it to a slow path.  On machines with low
> >     memory, there will be small amount of additional overhead as pages get
> >     shuffled between lists but it should quickly settle.
> > 
> > which causes death on unpacking initramfs on my nommu board. With this
> > reverted, everything works as expected. Note that this blows up with all of
> > SLOB/SLUB/SLAB.
> > 
> > I'll continue debugging it, and can post my .config if it will be helpful, but
> > hopefully you have some suggestions on what to try :-)
> > 
> 
> Based on the output you have given me, it would appear the real
> underlying cause is that fragmentation caused the allocation to fail.
> The following patch might fix the problem.
>
Unfortunately this has no impact, the same issue occurs.

Note that with 49255c619fbd482d704289b5eb2795f8e3b7ff2e reverted, show_mem()
shows the following:

alloc order 7 for 49000: pages 0c21c000
Mem-Info:
Normal per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
Active_anon:0 active_file:2 inactive_anon:0
 inactive_file:320 unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
 free:2782 slab:0 mapped:0 pagetables:0 bounce:0
Normal free:11128kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:8kB inactive_file:1280kB unevictable:0kB present:16256kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0
Normal: 0*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB 1*8192kB 0*16384kB 0*32768kB = 11128kB
323 total pagecache pages
4096 pages RAM
662 pages reserved
227 pages shared
289 pages non-shared
0 pages in pagetable cache

while with it applied, consistently:

alloc order 7 for 49000:
modprobe: page allocation failure. order:7, mode:0xd0
...
Mem-Info:
Normal per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
Active_anon:0 active_file:0 inactive_anon:0
 inactive_file:0 unevictable:323 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
 free:2910 slab:0 mapped:0 pagetables:0 bounce:0
Normal free:11640kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:1292kB present:16256kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0
Normal: 252*4kB 245*8kB 238*16kB 152*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB 0*8192kB 0*16384kB 0*32768kB = 11640kB
323 total pagecache pages
4096 pages RAM
662 pages reserved
226 pages shared
289 pages non-shared
0 pages in pagetable cache
-ENOMEM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/