Re: [PATCH 08/18] tracing: Add kprobe-based event tracer

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:31:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Add kprobes-based event tracer on ftrace.
> > 
> > This tracer is similar to the events tracer which is based on 
> > Tracepoint infrastructure. Instead of Tracepoint, this tracer is 
> > based on kprobes (kprobe and kretprobe). It probes anywhere where 
> > kprobes can probe(this
> >  means, all functions body except for __kprobes functions).
> > 
> > Similar to the events tracer, this tracer doesn't need to be 
> > activated via current_tracer, instead of that, just set probe 
> > points via /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events. And you can 
> > set filters on each probe events via 
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/<EVENT>/filter.
> 
> ok, one observation here: this should seemlessly merge into 
> /debug/tracing/events/ and provide a record format descriptor in 
> 'format' to allow the automated fetching of the results of the 
> probe. The PERF_SAMPLE_RAW gateway should work as well.
>  
> That way tooling that knows about /debug/tracing/events/ will 
> automatically work with kprobes events as well. We can profile based 
> on kprobes, etc. etc.
> 
> The _setting_ of the probe is still a separate channel - but if 
> existing installed probes are merged into existing tooling that's a 
> big step forward in terms of utility.
> 
> 	Ingo


It does already :)

But I've split out this patch that initially embeded the documentation.
If you look at the 9/10 patch, you can see how look like the format
files for kprobes.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/