Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM: Asynchronous suspend of devices

[Pavel Machek]

> @@ -659,26 +674,61 @@ static pm_message_t resume_event(pm_mess
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - *	device_suspend_noirq - Shut down one device (late suspend).
> - *	@dev:	Device.
> - *	@state: PM transition of the system being carried out.
> + * __device_suspend_noirq - Execute a "late" suspend callback for given device.
> + * @dev: Device to suspend.
> + * @state: PM transition of the system being carried out.

>   *
> - *	This is called with interrupts off and only a single CPU running.

that still looks like useful comment... why delete it?

> + * The driver of the device won't receive interrupts while this function is
> + * being executed.
>   */
> @@ -696,13 +746,19 @@ int dpm_suspend_noirq(pm_message_t state
>  	suspend_device_irqs();
>  	mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(dev, &dpm_list, power.entry) {
> +		dev->power.status = DPM_OFF_IRQ;
>  		error = device_suspend_noirq(dev, state);
>  		if (error) {
>  			pm_dev_err(dev, state, " late", error);
> +			dev->power.status = DPM_OFF;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		if (async_error) {
> +			error = async_error;
>  			break;

async_error is 'interesting'. How does locking work in noirq case?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/