Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] introduce device async actions mechanism

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday 13 August 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On a second thought, though, would it be a good idea to add
> > pm_runtime_get_noresume() / pm_runtime_put_sync() around the bus_for_each_drv()
> > in device_attach()?  That would prevent us from resuming-suspending the device
> > on each failing probe.
> 
> Good idea.  But don't remove the existing code in driver_probe_device.

Sure.

OK, I'll make this change and post rev. 16 shortly.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/