Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/13/2009 06:46 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> We need to ignore the referenced bit on active anon pages
> on very large systems, but it could indeed be helpful to
> respect the referenced bit on smaller systems.
>
> I have no idea where the cut-off between them would be.
>
> Maybe at inactive_ratio <= 4 ?

Why do we need to ignore the referenced bit in such cases?  To avoid 
overscanning?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/