Re: [RFC v6][PATCH 0b/4] intel_txt: Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technologysupport for Linux - Details

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Wed Aug 12 2009 - 11:13:53 EST


On 08/12/2009 07:53 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> i reviewed & tried the latest patches. Structure of v6 looks now
>> looks pretty good, but there are some build problems:
>>
>> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c: In function âtboot_probeâ:
>> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c:76: error: implicit declaration of function âset_fixmapâ
>> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c:76: error: âFIX_TBOOT_BASEâ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c:76: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c:76: error: for each function it appears in.)
>> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c:77: error: implicit declaration of function âfix_to_virtâ
>> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c:77: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
>>
>> config attached.
>
> ok, hpa fixed this bug - i tested it some more and here's the next
> issue:
>
> arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `tboot_shutdown':
> (.text+0x2e3b5): undefined reference to `acpi_wakeup_address'arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `tboot_sleep':
> (.text+0x2e679): undefined reference to `acpi_wakeup_address'
>
> Config attached below.
>

tboot_sleep() references acpi_wakeup_address, which is only defined if
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is set. We *could* make TBOOT require
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP, but that looks like the wrong thing to do to me,
unless TXT somehow depends on having S3 support.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/