Re: [PATCH v3] x86: clear incorrectly forced X86_FEATURE_LAHF_LM flag

[Kevin Winchester]

2009/8/11 Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@xxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:37:56PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>> Since the BIOS apparently wrote some MSR to get LAHF_LM incorrectly
>> reported by CPUID, would it be possible to also correct that MSR so
>> that applications that execute CPUID get the correct feature flags?
>
> That's a good catch, actually. We have to turn off that bit in the cpuid
> leaf too if the CPU doesn't support the instructions so that cpuid info
> is consistent. LAHF/SAHF support in 64bit mode has to be cpuid-checked
> prior to using them so that info has to be correct.
>
> @Kevin: willing to try a patch or two?
>

Sure, I'll give it a try this evening.  I assume that since Erratum 110 says:

--------------------------
Suggested Workaround
For processors which support the feature (as determined by the
processor revision ID), BIOS should
write a one to:
• MSR C001_100Dh, bit 32 for revision D silicon.
• MSR C001_1005h, bit 32 for revision E and later silicon.
This will cause the extended feature flag in ECX[0] to be set.
--------------------------

That writing a zero to those same MSRs would clear the feature flag?

-- 
Kevin Winchester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/