[PATCH 1/3] perfcounter: Initialize tracepoint record before any use

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Fri Aug 07 2009 - 22:27:08 EST


Despite that the tracepoint record is always present when the
PERF_SAMPLE_TP_RECORD flag is set, gcc whines, thinking it might not
be initialized:

kernel/perf_counter.c: In function âperf_counter_outputâ:
kernel/perf_counter.c:2650: warning: âtpâ may be used uninitialized in this function

Then, initialize it to NULL and always check if it's not NULL before
dereference it.

Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/perf_counter.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 142ae5a..a6963e2 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -2647,7 +2647,7 @@ void perf_counter_output(struct perf_counter *counter, int nmi,
u64 counter;
} group_entry;
struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain = NULL;
- struct perf_tracepoint_record *tp;
+ struct perf_tracepoint_record *tp = NULL;
int callchain_size = 0;
u64 time;
struct {
@@ -2718,7 +2718,8 @@ void perf_counter_output(struct perf_counter *counter, int nmi,

if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TP_RECORD) {
tp = data->private;
- header.size += tp->size;
+ if (tp)
+ header.size += tp->size;
}

ret = perf_output_begin(&handle, counter, header.size, nmi, 1);
@@ -2784,7 +2785,7 @@ void perf_counter_output(struct perf_counter *counter, int nmi,
}
}

- if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TP_RECORD)
+ if ((sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TP_RECORD) && tp)
perf_output_copy(&handle, tp->record, tp->size);

perf_output_end(&handle);
--
1.6.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/