Re: [PATCH 3/5] tty: handle VT specific compat ioctls in vt driver

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 02:34:53AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:02:11PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 07 August 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Ok. This looks like a nice series. A bkl pushdown that only goes down
> > > in one site among several others enlightens the understanding of what it
> > > is protecting (beside the nice fact it also burned three bkl callsites :-)
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Well, most importantly patch 5/5 fixes a long-standing bug where we held
> > the BKL in lots of places that were already proven not to need it, or
> > alternatively held it twice (nested) in the ioctls that may still need it.
> > 
> > I did patch 3/5 this way because I read that you were working on BKL
> > removal for TTY and wanted to do my share by removing the dependency
> > on the code that I care about (fs/compat_ioctl.h).
> > 
> > 	Arnd <><
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I guess these patches could fit in the tty tree, unless someone has
> objections?

I've taken this patch, I didn't see any others sent to me :(

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/