Re: [PATCH] Document pci_ids.h addition policy.

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Aug 06 2009 - 15:47:17 EST


On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:13:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:33:26AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > > I agree. In fact, I'd go further, and say that the bulk of what we have
> > > in pci_ids.h is also pointlessly shared. Only a tiny fraction of the device
> > > entries in that file are used by multiple files in the kernel.
> >
> > I agree with that as well, which is why when I was PCI maintainer, I
> > didn't allow any new additions to the pci_ids.h file, unless it was
> > going to be an id that was shared by different drivers. That cut the
> > new additions down to about none :)
>
> Perhaps documenting this is a good idea to prevent things being moved there,
> as it still seems to be happening judging from the git log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/