Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?

From: Avi Kivity
Date: Thu Aug 06 2009 - 05:55:29 EST


On 08/06/2009 12:35 PM, Wu Fengguang wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:35:59PM +0800, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/06/2009 12:25 PM, Wu Fengguang wrote:
So you're effectively running a 256M guest on a 128M host?

Do cgroups have private active/inactive lists?

Yes, and they reuse the same page reclaim routines with the global
LRU lists.

Then this looks like a bug in the shadow accessed bit handling.

Yes. One question is: why only stack pages hurts if it is a
general page reclaim problem?

Do we know for a fact that only stack pages suffer, or is it what has been noticed?


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/