Re: [PATCH 1/2] ds2760: switch to new dev_pm_ops

[Daniel Mack]

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:57:47PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Daniel Mack wrote:
> > +static struct dev_pm_ops ds2760_battery_pm_ops = {
> > +       .suspend        = ds2760_battery_suspend,
> > +       .resume         = ds2760_battery_resume,
> > +};
> 
> Just to make sure...
> 
> Have you followed the earlier discussions on dev_pm_ops conversions and 
> are you aware that if done like this the driver no longer supports 
> hibernation?
> 
> If omitting hibernation is intentional, it should probably be justified in 
> the commit log.
> 
> See http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/25/118 for background.

Hmm, I tested that on a embedded hardware platform which doesn't supoprt
hibernation anyway. But you're right, to prevent regressions, .freeze
and .thaw should probably be given as well.

I'll fix that and resend.

Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/