Re: [PATCH] [11/19] HWPOISON: Refactor truncate to allow directtruncating of page v2

[Andi Kleen]

> I haven't brought up the caller at this point, but IIRC you had
> the page locked and mapping confirmed at this point anyway so
> it would never be an error for your code.
> 
> Probably it would be nice to just force callers to verify the page.
> Normally IMO it is much nicer and clearer to do it at the time the
> page gets locked, unless there is good reason otherwise.

Ok. I think I'll just keep it as it is for now.

The only reason I added the error code was to make truncate_inode_page
fit into .error_remove_page, but then latter I did another wrapper
so it could be removed again. But it won't hurt to have it either.

-Andi


-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/