Re: [PATCH 1/4] oom: move oom_adj to signal_struct

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> > > What do you think about this approach ?
> > 
> > I can ack this. but please re-initialize oom_scale_down at fork and
> > exec time.
> > currently oom_scale_down makes too big affect.
> 
> 
> Thanks for carefult review. 
> In fact, I didn't care of it 
> since it just is RFC for making sure my idea. :)

ok, I see.

> > and, May I ask which you hate my approach? 
> 
> Not at all. I never hate your approach. 
> This problem resulted form David's original patch.
> I thought if we will fix live lock with different approach, we can remove much pain.

I also think your approach is enough acceptable.

ok, Let's wait one night and to hear other developer's opinion.
We can choice more lkml preferred approach :)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/