Re: [PATCH -mm] introduce tracehook_finish_jctl() helper

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 08/01, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > Confused.  This patch has no effect.
>
> Indeed, the three patches changing do_signal_stop() have no immediate
> material effect.  They all just clean up the code and prepare the hooks
> that utrace (or something like it) needs to make tracing stops mesh well
> with job control stops.  I'd thought it might be simpler for review to just
> roll these three together and send you a single patch to replace
> signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch; but Oleg decided to keep it
> sliced smaller.

But let me repeat, I would be happy if these 2 new patches are folded
into signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/