Re: [patch -mm v2] mm: introduce oom_adj_child

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:45:19 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > "just inherit at fork, change at exec" is an usual manner, I think.
> > If oom_adj_exec rather than oom_adj_child, I won't complain, more.
> > 
> But this/(and yours) requires users to rewrite their apps.
> Then, breaks current API.
> please fight with other guardians.

Definitely, I never agree regressionful ABI change ;)
At least, I still think it can be fixable.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/