Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface forcacheable accesses

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>> Ingo, these patches might as well go through x86 tree.  If you think
>>>>> that would be better, please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>> Makes sense to me.  I'll pull them into x86/percpu.
>>> Cool, dropping from my tree then.
>>
>> We can delegate the contents of x86/percpu to you (the topic branch  
>> contains no patches over mainline right now) - i.e. we can pull those 
>> bits from you and they could also be in your tree to keep your testing 
>> & integration consistent.
>>
>
> I just pushed out these branches into tip:x86/percpu.

Thanks! (I'll test it and push it out into -tip:master.)

> [...]  We can zap those if there is a tree head you'd rather use.

It's fine this way i think.

Tejun: in the future you might want to offer up new x86-only bits 
based on tip:x86/percpu as git pulls.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/