Re: [patch 0/8] 2.6.27.27-stable review

[Stefan Richter]

Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> You may want to review this:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/3/36
> .. and its follow-up:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/3/294
> .. and this old one (can't believe it's still there) :
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/3/463

Well, why don't /you/ review these issues?  (Are these bugs which meet 
the criteria enumerated in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt?  Is 
there a fix in mainline which can be taken over as-is or in similar form 
for 2.6.x.y?)

If the answer to both is yes, submit patches as described in 
stable_kernel_rules.txt.

If you are not quite sure about the criteria, discuss the bugs and their 
fixes with the respective maintainers who should know them well enough 
to judge whether they are -stable material.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= -=== =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/