Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jul 16 2009 - 05:54:21 EST


On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 15:12 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2009/7/16 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > I've asked several times to comment on the removal of that generation
> > count DaveM did. Is that a normal part of DFS, or was that an
> > optimization on top particular to this problem, can something similar be
> > done for BFS, etc.
>
> DFS uses generation count DaveM did to decide if a class is visted, and BFS
> uses bitmap to mark a class is visted or not and the extra efficiency loss is
>
> bitmap_zero(bfs_accessed, MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES);
>
> before staring each BFS.
>
> On most of ARCH, bimap_zero can be optimizied to only consume very few
> instructions,
> can't it?
>
> It seems bitmap is more easily used in BFS than generation count.

Ah, I so missed that, sorry about that.

I'll go over the patches one more time and push them out.

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/