Re: Soft-Lockup/Race in networking in 2.6.31-rc1+195 (possibly?caused by netem)
From: Jarek Poplawski
Date: Fri Jul 03 2009 - 18:57:23 EST
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:22:20PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:03:01 +0000
>
> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:26:21PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On Friday 03 July 2009 08:12:13 Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 03:31:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> > ...
> >> >
> >> > > Ok. I finally see the light. I bisected the issue down to
> >> > > eea08f32adb3f97553d49a4f79a119833036000a : timers: Logic to move non
> >> > > pinned timers
> >> > >
> >> > > Disabling timer migration like provided in the earlier commit stops the
> >> > > issue from occuring.
> >> > >
> >> > > That it is related to timers is sensible in the light of my findings,
> >> > > that I could trigger the issue only when using delay in netem - that is
> >> > > the codepath using qdisc_watchdog...
> >> >
> >> > Andres, thanks for your work and time. It saved me a lot of searching,
> >> > because I wasn't able to trigger this on my old box.
> >> Thanks. It allowed me to go through some of my remaining paperwork ;-)
> >>
> >> Does anybody of you have an idea where the problem actually resides?
> >
> > Do you mean possibly broken timers are not enough?
>
> Well, if you look at that commit the bisect pointed to Jarek, it is a
> change which starts causing a situation which never happened before.
> Namely, timers added on one cpu can be migrated and fire on another.
>
> So this could be exposing races in the networking that technically
> always existed.
I'm not sure I get your point; could you give some example?
Actually, I've suspected races in timers code.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/