Re: [Bug #13522] BUG: scheduling while atomic

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (06/29/09 15:41), Alan Cox wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> Yes although getting people seeing to test with might_sleep() checks in
> the tty layer demonstrate the tty layer isn't calling into ppp with irqs
> disabled when it shouldn't so I'm at a loss as to whether this is a
> network bug, a scheduler bug or something else.

Looks like I can't reproduce with rc1-git5 (after several hours)...
I'll try -git3,-git4.

> 
> The schedule error in __tasklet_schedule() is itself rather peicular.
> 


Reported	: 2009-06-28 22:07 by Rafael J. Wysocki
Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13652
Subject         : scheduling while atomic: pptpgw

Rafael, I'm not sure we need 'scheduling while atomic: pptpgw' bug.
Initially BUG 13522 was named "BUG: scheduling while atomic: pptpgw" 
and renamed to "BUG: scheduling while atomic" since I was not sure wheter this is ppp or scheduler bug...

---
kernel: [ 1424.347514] BUG: scheduling while atomic: ksoftirqd/0/4/0x10000500
kernel: [27404.945372] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pptpgw/4637/0x00000400
kernel: [ 1715.273674] BUG: scheduling while atomic: ksoftirqd/0/4/0x10000500
kernel: [ 1631.073371] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pptpgw/3169/0x10000500
...
---

	Sergey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/