Re: [PATCH] allow execve'ing "/proc/self/exe" even if /proc is not mounted

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Fri Jun 26 2009 - 09:27:00 EST


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 04:00, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> With this patch, it is possible to execute /proc/self/exe
>>> even if /proc is not mounted. In the below example,
>>> ./sh is a static shell binary:
>>
>> What if the user has procfs mounted somewherelse, what if they are in a
>> chroot where you don't want them to patch the binary and re-exec it ?
>>
>> It would be far far cleaner for NOMMU to have a NOMMU private "reexec()"
>> call that didn't rely on procfs or hacking names into the kernel.
>>
>> So NAK
>
> I am ok with it. Are other people ok with adding a syscall
> just for this purpose? Al?

please try a custom binfmt first
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/