Re: [PATCH] udf: remove redundant tests on unsigned

From: Jan Kara
Date: Wed Jun 24 2009 - 07:49:10 EST


On Mon 22-06-09 23:12:29, Roel Kluin wrote:
> first_block and goal are unsigned. When negative they are wrapped and caught by
> the other test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the patch. I've merged it in UDF tree.

Honza

> ---
> diff --git a/fs/udf/balloc.c b/fs/udf/balloc.c
> index e48e9a3..1e06853 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/balloc.c
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int udf_bitmap_prealloc_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
>
> mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
> part_len = sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len;
> - if (first_block < 0 || first_block >= part_len)
> + if (first_block >= part_len)
> goto out;
>
> if (first_block + block_count > part_len)
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int udf_bitmap_new_block(struct super_block *sb,
> mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
>
> repeat:
> - if (goal < 0 || goal >= sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len)
> + if (goal >= sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len)
> goal = 0;
>
> nr_groups = bitmap->s_nr_groups;
> @@ -666,8 +666,7 @@ static int udf_table_prealloc_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
> int8_t etype = -1;
> struct udf_inode_info *iinfo;
>
> - if (first_block < 0 ||
> - first_block >= sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len)
> + if (first_block >= sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len)
> return 0;
>
> iinfo = UDF_I(table);
> @@ -743,7 +742,7 @@ static int udf_table_new_block(struct super_block *sb,
> return newblock;
>
> mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
> - if (goal < 0 || goal >= sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len)
> + if (goal >= sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len)
> goal = 0;
>
> /* We search for the closest matching block to goal. If we find
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/