Re: [PATCH for mmotm 1/5] cleanp page_remove_rmap()

From: Wu Fengguang
Date: Thu Jun 11 2009 - 19:21:56 EST


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:26:04PM +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] cleanp page_remove_rmap()
>
> page_remove_rmap() has multiple PageAnon() test and it has
> a bit deeply nesting.
>
> cleanup here.
>
> note: this patch doesn't have behavior change.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> mm/rmap.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/mm/rmap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -862,34 +862,39 @@ void page_dup_rmap(struct page *page, st
> */
> void page_remove_rmap(struct page *page)
> {
> - if (atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount)) {
> - /*
> - * Now that the last pte has gone, s390 must transfer dirty
> - * flag from storage key to struct page. We can usually skip
> - * this if the page is anon, so about to be freed; but perhaps
> - * not if it's in swapcache - there might be another pte slot
> - * containing the swap entry, but page not yet written to swap.
> - */
> - if ((!PageAnon(page) || PageSwapCache(page)) &&
> - page_test_dirty(page)) {
> - page_clear_dirty(page);
> - set_page_dirty(page);
> - }
> - if (PageAnon(page))
> - mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
> - __dec_zone_page_state(page,
> - PageAnon(page) ? NR_ANON_PAGES : NR_FILE_MAPPED);
> - mem_cgroup_update_mapped_file_stat(page, -1);
> - /*
> - * It would be tidy to reset the PageAnon mapping here,
> - * but that might overwrite a racing page_add_anon_rmap
> - * which increments mapcount after us but sets mapping
> - * before us: so leave the reset to free_hot_cold_page,
> - * and remember that it's only reliable while mapped.
> - * Leaving it set also helps swapoff to reinstate ptes
> - * faster for those pages still in swapcache.
> - */
> + if (!atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount)) {
> + /* the page is still mapped another one */
> + return;
> }

Coding style nitpick.
I'd prefer to remove the brackets and move the comment above the line:

/* page still mapped by someone else? */
if (!atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount))
return;

Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/