Re: [patch] x86: clear TS in irq_ts_save() when in an atomicsection

[Ingo Molnar]

* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -	if (!in_interrupt())
> +	if (!in_atomic() && !in_interrupt())
>  		return 0;

since in_interrupt() implies in_atomic() (upstream), why not just 
do:

	if (!in_atomic())
 		return 0;

?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/