[PATCH 0/3] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Mon Jun 08 2009 - 09:01:46 EST


A bug was brought to my attention against a distro kernel but it affects
mainline and I believe problems like this have been reported in various guises
on the mailing lists although I don't have specific examples at the moment.

The problem that was reported that led to this patchset was that malloc()
stalled for a long time (minutes in some cases) if a large tmpfs mount
was occupying a large percentage of memory overall. The pages did not get
cleaned or reclaimed by zone_reclaim() because the zone_reclaim_mode was
unsuitable, but the lists are uselessly scanned frequencly making the CPU
spin at near 100%.

I do not have the bug resolved yet although I believe patch 1 of this series
addresses it and am waiting to hear back from the bug reporter. However,
the fix should work two other patches in this series also should bring
zone_reclaim() more in line with expectations.

Patch 1 reintroduces zone_reclaim_interval to catch the situation where
zone_reclaim() cannot tell in advance that the scan is a waste
of time.

Patch 2 alters the heuristics that zone_reclaim() uses to determine if the
scan should go ahead. Currently, it is basically assuming
zone_reclaim_mode is 1

Patch 3 notes that zone_reclaim() returning a failure automatically means
the zone is marked full. This is not always true. It could have failed
because the GFP mask or zone_reclaim_mode are unsuitable. The patch
makes zone_reclaim() more careful about marking zones temporarily full

Note, this patchset has not been tested heavily.

Comments?

Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt | 13 +++++++++++
include/linux/mmzone.h | 9 ++++++++
include/linux/swap.h | 1 +
kernel/sysctl.c | 9 ++++++++
mm/internal.h | 4 +++
mm/page_alloc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++---
mm/vmscan.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/