Re: [PATCH] integrity: fix IMA inode leak

[Mimi Zohar]

On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 21:18 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> CONFIG_IMA=y inode activity leaks iint_cache and radix_tree_node objects
> until the system runs out of memory.  Nowhere is calling ima_inode_free()
> a.k.a. ima_iint_delete().  Fix that by calling it from destroy_inode().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This call was accidentally dropped in the conversion from
using the LIM hooks to embedding the IMA calls directly. I'm 
really sorry.

Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> 
>  fs/inode.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> --- 2.6.30-rc8/fs/inode.c	2009-05-16 10:26:15.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/fs/inode.c	2009-06-06 17:41:21.000000000 +0100
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ static struct inode *alloc_inode(struct
>  void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  {
>  	BUG_ON(inode_has_buffers(inode));
> +	ima_inode_free(inode);
>  	security_inode_free(inode);
>  	if (inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode)
>  		inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode(inode);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/