Re: [PATCH] integrity: fix IMA inode leak

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> CONFIG_IMA=y inode activity leaks iint_cache and radix_tree_node objects
> until the system runs out of memory.  Nowhere is calling ima_inode_free()
> a.k.a. ima_iint_delete().  Fix that by calling it from destroy_inode().

Shouldn't we call it from "security_inode_free()" instead? And shouldn't 
it be allocated in "security_inode_alloc()"? That sounds like the correct 
nesting here, since the whole integrity thing is under the security 
module.

Hmm?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/